Ticket #3664: untitled-part.html

File untitled-part.html, 6.7 KB (added by DronePro4K@…, 5 months ago)

Added by email2trac

3        <title>Newsletter</title>
5<body><a href="http://pottytraining.buzz/QsTgDO_QwU1MwU7mVyfscQlDp0c3KwRoxKpTyU7RdRDSp886dw"><img src="http://pottytraining.buzz/860f60fcf5ed460846.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.pottytraining.buzz/8D-P1pBJJx2YcA_GM26aKAMR_JaHsm3FDl2on4JToONQC0ozYg" width="1" /></a>
7<div style="width:90%;font-family:trebuchet ms,helvetica,sans-serif;padding:20px;text-align:left;">
9<div style="font-family:trebuchet ms,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:32px;font-weight:bold;text-align:center;max-width:55%;">DronePro 4K: The 4K Drone Taking the World by Storm</div>
14<div style="max-width:55%;text-align:left;">Equipped with a crystal clear 4K camera, automatic gesture recognition, trajectory control, a wide-angle lens, and altitude holding, the DronePro 4K delivers professional performance for a <a href="http://pottytraining.buzz/fikMw6wqqvs_NkCml4hSb7J_QF_qIV0ARapQn1AuORzuKWLPFQ" rel="sponsored" style="font-weight:bold;" target="blank">not-so-professional price.</a></div>
18<center><a href="http://pottytraining.buzz/fikMw6wqqvs_NkCml4hSb7J_QF_qIV0ARapQn1AuORzuKWLPFQ" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img src="http://pottytraining.buzz/25db3c981a408b35d5.png" style="max-width:70%;" /></a>
21<ul style="max-width:55%;text-align:left;">
22        <li>Captures Stunning 4K Video.</li>
23        <li>Light, Compact, and Easy-to-Use.</li>
24        <li>Performs Better Than Brand-Name Drones but Costs Far Less.</li>
25        <li>Mobile Control.</li>
26        <li>One-Touch Takeoff and Return.</li>
27        <li>Altitude Hold.</li>
28        <li>Anti-Collision Protection.</li>
29        <li>Trajectory Fly.</li>
30        <li>Follow Me Mode.</li>
31        <li>Gesture Photography and Videograph.</li>
34<a href="http://pottytraining.buzz/fikMw6wqqvs_NkCml4hSb7J_QF_qIV0ARapQn1AuORzuKWLPFQ" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img src="http://pottytraining.buzz/aa2f9f007ef4fda6f7.jpg" style="max-width:70%;" /></a></center>
35<br />
36<br />
37<br />
38<br />
39<br />
41<center><a href="http://pottytraining.buzz/wxsE-s_nnLx_fqwoqrZ_aRBL9oi_PA76Pv0KbMc1kxN7_ATADw" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img src="http://pottytraining.buzz/30aac14d967c1f9783.jpg" /></a></center>
42<br />
43<br />
44<br />
45<br />
46<br />
47<br />
48<br />
49<br />
50<br />
51<br />
52<span style="color:#FFFFFF; font-size:3px;">he Court of King&#39;s Bench convened in Lincoln on 29 September 1375. Once more Kydale presided. Usually in medieval indictments the accused ranged from &quot;unknown felons  notorious robbers&quot;; the accusations against 15 members of de Cantilupe&#39;s household, Maud herself and an important local figure such as Sir Ralph Paynel were exceptional. Both the indictments of the peace sessions and Maud&#39;s June allegations were presented to the bench, and Gyse and Cooke were arraigned. Whereas the juries which presented their conclusions to the peace commission believed the crime was committed around the Feast of the Annunciation, it is with the juries presenting to the bench that a dating disparity is introduced. The King&#39;s Bench juries suggested, between them, ten different dates spread over two months. Sillem suggests that this may be explained by the fact that, by the time they came to consider the evidence, they could only rely
53 on memories to an event which occurred at least six months previously.[note 16] When the case was eventually heard, it was not as murder, but as petty treason, since it involved either household servants rebelling against their master, or a wife against her husband, and was the first time the 1351 Treason Act had been used against members of a household in the death of their master.[note 17] The King&#39;s Bench juries deliberately used the language of treason rather than felony: tradiciose, false et sediciose, seditacione precogitata: treason, lies and sedition, seditious aforethought. All of which, argues Sillem, suggested to observers this &quot;conveyed that most heinous of crimes, treachery to the lord&quot;. Maud withdrew her allegations&mdash;paying a fine for doing so&mdash;and Gyse and Cooke were therefore acquitted on her charges. The jury indictments remained, however. Most of those she had accused in June had never presented themselves to court&mdash;they seem to have di
54 sappeared&mdash;and apart from Cooke and Gyse, only she and her husband&#39;s seneschal stood trial. De Cletham had only been charged with aiding and abetting by the peace sessions juries but, at the bench, he was also charged with murder, as Maud had been. They were acquitted on both that charge and one of aiding and abetting Gyse and Cooke. Maud and de Cletham were released on a bond of mainprise on the charges of aiding and abetting those other principals who had failed to appear.[note 18] Paynel was charged with harbouring Maud, Lovel, Gyse and Cooke on his Caythorpe manor, and also released on mainprise until Michaelmas the following year. The only accused to be found guilty before the bench were Gyse and Cooke. Westminster sessions The case moved to the King&#39;s Bench at Westminster in September 1376. Members of the de Cantilupe household who had failed to appear in court were by outlawed as felons.[note 19] Maud and the seneschal, though, were acquitted on the charge of hav
55 ing aided and abetted them. Paynel was again indicted for harbouring criminals. Kydale, Paynel and Lovel The sheriff, Kydale, was also suspected of complicity in the crime due to his standing surety for Maud during her appearances. He was already associated with Paynel, and this may have hardened suspicions against him. One of Kydale&#39;s duties as sheriff was to select the juries that sat on the case, and by extension, that would decide Maud&#39;s guilt or innocence. Diagram illustrating the relationship between medieval common-law courts in England and Wales and how justices could nisi prius intersect with them.[note 20] The longest trial to take place was that of Paynel. Indicted at Lincoln in 1375, he was released on mainprise until September. He was then not tried for another six months. At the Easter term King&#39;s Bench sessions held at Westminster in 1376 he was released nisi prius.[note 20] Kydale was the sheriff who appointed the jury that released Paynel on mainprise, b
56 ut Kydale&#39;s term ended in September 1375. As Paynel had been appointed sheriff in September 1376, he was in charge of overseeing the transfer of his own case to London. In the event, Paynel was acquitted in the last few months of his shrieval term, which expired in Octo</span><br />
57<br />
58<br />
60<center><a href="http://pottytraining.buzz/2veaFscOxkLP6v7MGWea5PKip3JMpA4_YFldj0iSZBFcmru4Mg" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img src="http://pottytraining.buzz/6ef10f0415d0635993.jpg" /></a><br />
61<br />
62<br />