You may not have noticed, but there’s something different about the masks Trump has been wearing.

It’s a small but crucial detail.

And it’s the reason why he’s been able to continue his work on the campaign trail -- without the risk of spreading his infection to others.

It has to do with the material his mask is made of.

Unlike Trump’s mask… regular cloth and medical masks CANNOT filter 100% of the air you breathe and exhale.

So where do you get a mask like Trump’s?

Well, this isn’t the exact same mask Trump wears, but it does use similar technology.

It’s called an R95 mask, and it also has several other benefits:
The best part is, you can save up to 40% on your R95 if you grab one today…

If it’s good enough for the President, then it’s good enough for us.

And if you want a mask that filters ALL inhaled and exhaled air, then this is likely one of the only places you’ll be able to find it.

C.Hayes















 

urder of William de Cantilupe From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigationJump to search The murder of Sir William de Cantilupe by members of his household took place in Scotton, Lincolnshire, in March 1375. The de Cantilupe family was a long-established and influential one in the county, traditionally providing royal officials to the crown both in the central government and at the local level. Among William de Cantilupe's ancestors were royal councillors, bodyguards and, distantly, Saint Thomas de Cantilupe. De Cantilupe's death by multiple stab wounds was a cause célèbre. The chief suspects were two neighbours—a local knight, Ralph Paynel; and the sheriff, Sir Thomas Kydale—as well as de Cantilupe's entire household, particularly his wife Maud, the cook and a squire. The staff were probably paid to either carry out or cover up the crime, while Paynel had been in dispute with the de Cantilupes for many years; it is possible that Maud was conducting an affair with Kydale, during her husband's frequent absences on service in France during the Hundred Years' War. The Treason Act 1351 laid down that the murder of a husband by his wife or servants was to be deemed petty treason. De Cantilupe's murder was the first to come within the purview of the act, as were the subsequent trials of Maud and several members of her staff. Multiple people were indicted for the crime, although only two were convicted and, in the end, executed for it. Others were also summonsed but, as they never appeared, were outlawed instead. Other influential local figures, such as the sheriff, were accused of aiding and abetting the criminals. The last trial and acquittal was in 1378, although the case had long-term consequences. No motive has been established for de Cantilupe's killing; historians consider it most likely that responsibility rested with de Cantilupe's wife, her lover, th e cook and their neighbour, with a mix of motives including love and reven