HTTP/1.1 -1 Read error in cache disk data: SuccessContent-Type: text/tab-separated-values; charset="utf-8" Last-Modified: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 11:34:36 GMT Content-length: 2877 Connection: Close Proxy-Connection: Close X-Cache: HIT from web1.osuosl.org Server: ProxyTrack 0.5 (HTTrack 3.49.2) id summary reporter owner description type status priority milestone component version severity resolution keywords cc lang patch platform 3679 WATCH THIS: Create a product in 60 seconds! """Ebook Creator"" " "{{{ WATCH THIS: Create a product in 60 seconds! http://restozon.us/57KSzJhGJikkYoStvsb9fgRXhlZl3GWKVcpU1RhByypYWcz09A http://restozon.us/UZ45mmaBG9gyoob6bqlVud67ILutcCcu_s3r_3XazTax9LIZuA illem says that ""a certain amount of mystery surrounds Agatha"" the maid. Both she and Maud had been accused as both principles and accomplices—court records describe her as ""notoriously suspect"" in the crime—but ""like so many of the accused, she failed to appear in court"". Nothing is known of her as a person outside the de Cantilupe case, and her surname alternates in the documents between Lovel and Frere. In her case, though—unlike so many of her comrades—her reason for not appearing has been established. On Monday 27 August 1375 she escaped the immediate dispensing of justice by bribing her gaolers in Lincoln Castle, where she had been imprisoned awaiting trial.[note 22] The castle bailiffs, Thomas Thornhaugh and John Bate, were later arrested and tried for allowing Agatha to escape justice. Thornhaugh produced witnesses who swore he was innocent of the offence; he was acquitted of felony but fined for dereliction of duty. Pedersen reports that Bate ""provided a somewhat mor e unusual defence"". Accused in July 1377 of accepting £10 to allow Agatha to flee, he produced a pardon from the new king, Richard II, absolving Bate from any malfeasance of office, and a second pardon, dated the 8th of the same month, from the late king Edward III.[note 23] Cooke and Gyse Cooke and Gyse were charged of having with sedicioni precogitale ... interfecerunt et murdraverunt (""sedition aforethought ... killed and murdered"") their master.[note 24] As such, they were tried and subsequently convicted of petty treason. No motive was ever established for their role in the killings. The archivist Graham Platts notes that ""the affair was so complicated that no convictions for murder were made"". Although they had disappeared following their escape to Paynel's, in 1377 they were apprehended for the murder and executed for the crime (by being drawn and hanged). It is possible that they expected protection that never came. Pedersen suggests they may have been promised a form of insurance by their social betters against capture and conviction, or that if that occurred, they would be treated leniently and their families ""looked after in case [Gyse and Cooke] were not able to flee the country"". Motive Although no motive was established by the courts for the killing, historians have generally consider }}} [attachment:""untitled-part.html""] " new normal 2.11 none 3.8.0 medium "first">