Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of ParrotQuotes

Show
Ignore:
Timestamp:
02/18/09 02:10:41 (13 years ago)
Author:
cotto
Comment:

first version with a dozen or so quotes

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • ParrotQuotes

    v1 v1  
     1This page documents some of the amusing things said in #parrot.  It's not really useful, but it helps with -Ofun.  Feel free to add your own quotes (preferably from #parrot or parrot-devel). 
     2 
     3{{{ 
     4Whiteknight> i'm going to solve this issue if it kills me 
     5Whiteknight> and then I'm going to be all like "oh noes, it killz me! LOL" 
     6}}} 
     7{{{ 
     8particle> don't touch that code! it worked yesterday. mostly. 
     9}}} 
     10{{{ 
     11chromatic> Mac OS X will eventually provide a single header, called "oohshiny.h" 
     12           with a single function called "NSPushCandyColoredButton()". 
     13Coke>      I am drooling in anticipation of how shiny that button is! 
     14}}} 
     15{{{ 
     16Coke> ok, tickets are cheap, but they're not as cheap as your mom 
     17}}} 
     18{{{ 
     19cotto>     now to tackle "DOD" 
     20moritz>    department of defense? ;-) 
     21szbalint>  dangers of drinking 
     22Infinoid>  Donuts On Demand 
     23chromatic> Donut Order Detection 
     24moritz>    doughnuts of desaster 
     25szbalint>  DOD Ought Dereference 
     26chromatic> DOD of Recursing Daemons 
     27Infinoid>  devil's own doggy 
     28Infinoid>  deathtrap of despair 
     29}}} 
     30{{{ 
     31particle>    $haze_the_new_guy->() 
     32whiteknight> am I still the new guy? 
     33particle>    if you have to ask... 
     34whiteknight> damnit 
     35}}} 
     36{{{ 
     37particle>  i'll work on a shell alias for maek without a macarthur grant. 
     38particle>  i'm not proud. 
     39chromatic> Scab.  You're pushing wages down. 
     40}}} 
     41{{{ 
     42chromatic> ...and I'll slap the hand of anyone who suggests that we need to *mark* and *sweep*  
     43           these elements -- if you're lucky.  If you're not lucky, I'll take away your birthday. 
     44}}} 
     45{{{ 
     46Whiteknight> well, I'm sorry to hear that. Speaking of wireless networking, I'm about 30 seconds  
     47             away from breaking my goddamned router into a billion pieces 
     48Infinoid>    chances are, it isn't running my code then :) 
     49Whiteknight> no, it's some piece of shit netgear router. worst. router. ever. 
     50rurban>      who in the world buys this crap 
     51Infinoid>    Whiteknight, apparently 
     52}}} 
     53{{{ 
     54Whiteknight> We have an RT ticket that requests the creation of a BigNum PMC. ergo, I am writing one 
     55Whiteknight> and when we decide that it's a stupid thing to have, we can open a second ticket to have it removed 
     56Whiteknight> ...and I'll rake in the karma on both transactions :) 
     57}}} 
     58{{{ 
     59Coke> We do not need to reinvent every wheel. We're already reinventing several as it stands. 
     60}}} 
     61{{{ 
     62chromatic> But we have backwards compatibility with Perl 4 to consider, so we can't change too much. 
     63}}} 
     64{{{ 
     65chromatic> Want to work on a GC? 
     66PerlJam>   GC is completely opaque to me other than general concepts. 
     67chromatic> Then you're qualified. 
     68}}} 
     69{{{ 
     70Coke>        Whiteknight: lucky for your, partcl doesn't use pct. 
     71Coke>        *you 
     72Whiteknight> what does partcl use instead? 
     73jonathan>    Whiteknight: It's written in a combination of bf and lolcode. 
     74}}} 
     75{{{ 
     76Whiteknight> oh great, I can just imagine what a recursive descent parser must look like in bf 
     77chromatic>   Just like any other bf code, really. 
     78}}} 
     79{{{ 
     80NotFound> PerlJam: at least you realize that others countries exists ;) 
     81pmichaud> NotFound:  PerlJam and I are in Texas, so yes -- we know about the other 49 countries. 
     82}}} 
     83{{{ 
     84davidfetter> sam adams?!? in portland? i'd think in a brewpub town like portland, he'd lose on the name alone 
     85Whiteknight> yeah, that's why his opponent, Guinnes McBudweiser lost 
     86}}} 
     87{{{ 
     88Infinoid>  I didn't distill anything, I just wrote it from scratch with malice aforethought. 
     89chromatic> Good.  I'm concerned that we haven't done that enough recently. 
     90}}}